I haven't edited the comments to my last post. Nor replied to them. It's a heated issue, and I'd rather get involved by making a clear statement than by making short replies that could get misunderstood.
I had the opportunity to speak to someone who actually knows some crackers, and I learnt a lot about how it works. And to explain what I learnt, we need to start with ethics.
In my last post I talked about how it is unethical to use cracked software. I also referred (perhaps not as clearly as I should have) to the critical distinction between a lost sale and a non-potential sale. Let me restate this: a 14-yr old who wants to learn about making music the way that professionals do it and uses cracked software is not a potential sale. 14-yr olds do not have £3500 to spend on studio equipment to get started. There is an argument that they could learn by using free software - and many do, but the point is that free software is not what the professionals use- if it was, there would be NO music software market.
A lost sale is a producer who is making his money by selling records, or perhaps renting studio time, who gets a cracked piece of software and decides that there's no point in buying it, because he has it now.
No-one in this market suffers from non-potential sales. Ever. In fact, the reverse is completely true. If you work in this industry, you DO know people who started out with cracked software and now have spent thousands and thousands of pounds on their studios. If you don't know anyone like this, then you either know less than two people, or you don't work in the industry. This is a fact. If there was no crack of Photoshop, there would be FEWER legitimate Photoshop users. The fact that businesses HAVE to buy Photoshop for their employees forces this to be the case, but it's equally true in music just because musicians are (with almost no exceptions) GOOD people.
Now, suppose we naively believe that people who can afford to buy software will do so. We believe this, because it's true for us, and we don't really think anyone would be that different to us.
Well then, ON THAT ASSUMPTION, it becomes an ethically justifiable case to crack software and make it available to people who need it but can't afford it, safe in the knowledge that as soon as they CAN afford it, they will, of course, buy it! This, so I am informed, is the ethical foundation for the cracking community. And clearly, this will develop into an ethically driven and ethically justified community of people working together for a common good.
Effectively, cracking is aggressive marketing to people who can't YET form part of your customerbase, done for you, the developer, by a 3rd party.
The crackers feel ethically justified in what they are doing, because their foundations show that they can't harm you. Hey, they've probably paid for the copy that they use themselves.
So there's this lovely symbiotic relationship going on, where the crackers provide new software to people who /can't/ buy it, so that one day they will. Great.
Except that the assumption is, apparently, wrong. Not enormously wrong, but wrong enough to show up some nasty statistics. Y'see, people who /can/ afford to buy the software are also getting their hands on the cracks. That's not what the developers want - because these people ARE potential sales. That's not what the crackers want either - these people are mocking the crackers by using the cracks commercially.
Go find some cracks and read the files that the hackers include with them. The more respected the cracking group, the heavier the emphasis on "try before you buy", and "if you use it, pay for it". This is universally true.
So, it's not the crackers that hurt the developers, it's dishonest users. Of course, there's an easy argument that if the crackers didn't distribute the cracks to /anyone/, then there'd be no problem with dishonest users. There'd also be fewer users, and less publicity for products. Swings and roundabouts - statistics you can never gather, because it's a clear example of the uncertainty principle; if you try to measure it, you'll change it.
I personally believe that this wraps up the story with the crackers. They have an ethical standpoint that is naively defensible. However, they're being exploited in the same way as developers. It was not for nothing that I urged anyone seeking to hack the Sonalksis plugins to customise the UIs to show that they were cracks. I really will release the installer files upon request to any crackers who want them in order to repackage the plugs.
Do legitimate users care if 14-yr-old kids have a copy of the software that they've paid for to play around with? I consider that pretty unlikely. If you've gotten far enough in this industry to be able to afford pro plugins, then you already have a pretty good idea of how all this works. Better than I do, most likely. And EVERYONE can get hold of the 30-day demo anytime - they're just using the "infinite demo", because that's their culture.
But users who could easily afford to buy plugins but don't... what to do? Users who'll happily pay out a few grand on hardware, but not even a few pounds on software...
...will be discussed in a future posting.
Dave.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
This is one place where Steve Massey deserves some props. I think his system is going to be the most effective going forward, and here's why.
He makes a great set of plug-ins (admittedly, RTAS only, but it's a great start). Now, let's say you ARE a starving student just getting into recording and need to learn a few things. Guess what? You get the core DSP for FREE. Yes, he gives away limited, albeit completely functional and great-sounding plug-ins at no charge. If I was a starving student with no money and -some- ethics, I would absolutely download the whole suite and go to town. Yes, there are limitations, but they can be worked-around. I'd write down my settings since I couldn't save them, but I'd be getting some amazing sounds. And then, when I could scrape together $69 apiece (save for one, which is a crazy $89!) I'd pay for them and get the extended feature set. You can't really lose. I am not a starving student, but I started with his full demo set, and I'm slowly upgrading each one - one at a time, in order of necessesity. I feel bad -not- paying for them.
In summary, THIS is the way to do it, if you ask me. Give me an unlimited demo, great support, great sound, and charge me to take it to the next level. Make it difficult but not impossible to use your unlimited demo, and don't treat your customers like criminals.
I think Sonalksis is doing a good thing with the 'one free plug-in' [FreeG] that sort of sucks you in - or is value-added to your current stuff, whichever is applicable. Obviously the Sonalksis stuff is a bit more money than the Massey stuff, but you're not a one-man operation either and have been around a little longer. But do have a look at his model - I bet it's working better than anyone could have imagined and will continue to do so in the future.
I'm proud to say I don't have a single [k] on my disk, but there are companies that do make me wonder sometimes...
Good points Dave and I really do hope that cracking groups honor your wishes. I remember the story about H20 group and the legendary Radium group who made sure all the startup screens showed their logo (they usually completely replaced the original splash screen of the software) at startup. I even remember them encrypting the images so that people wouldn't be able to rip out the pictures. This was of course to encourage people to buy the software. Radium even had a policy of not cracking software that cost less than 60$ or so though I don't know if they honored this.
Also, there are rumors that some of the respected cracking groups have been contacted directly by the developers in the hopes that their software would be "introduced" to a wider audience!
Terminal3: I kind of agree but I'd go even further than that and do it like the Reaper author does it. Fully functional software.
I began out like the 14 yo in your post. cracks were a part of life and the only way I had a chance to produce the things that lead me to the professional circumstances I'm in now. as money came through it was soooo tempting to just buy hardware like everyone else around me but as a person who had strong desire to build my own software one day I started forking out first for software. In my circle of "professionals" I am alone in owning all my software. cracks still come into the equation for me, especially when it comes to "dongle" based software .. but quite simply if i use it, i buy it. I try sooo hard to get others to follow this model.. but expensive hardware that gets used a lot less than their plugins always gets financial priority. I think that stinks.. especially when you can afford it. and if you can't afford... use it and make some great work and one day you might be able to afford it!
good luck!
Thank you, Dave. You've hit the nail on the head. I wish I could afford to buy every plug that I come across, but I can't. I have to pick and choose carefully, otherwise I wind up with something I don't need or want. Disabled demos (i.e.- some parameters don't work, can't save settings, audio drops) are the bane of my musical existence. Not only do I not get a proper feel for the software, I also have hidden files that are on my machine until I reformat. It might not seem like much, but over time, those add up, and a lot of demo's don't even include uninstallers. You just have to hope you cleared everything when you're done.
I can't tell you how many cracked plugs I've tried and found myself NOT buying because the interface wasn't comfortable or the sound wasn't what I was looking for. I CAN tell you that the iZotope, Native Instruments, Waves, and, of course, Sonalksis plugs that I've purchased have been because of cracks, and not demos.
Keep up the good work... you guys are awesome.
Post a Comment